Mastodonvstextsnap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | textsnap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.
If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →textsnap details →