Mastodonvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →supabase-automated-self-host details →