# Mastodon vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mastodon | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mastodon-vs-qwc2