# Mastodon vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mastodon | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 42 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.4.27 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 42 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QFieldCloud.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mastodon-vs-qfieldcloud