# Mastodon vs Open Data Capture

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mastodon | Open Data Capture |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #3 of 3 in Data Collection |
| GitHub stars | 50 459 ✓ | 119 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +139 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 42 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.4.27 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 42 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Data Capture is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)
- [Open Data Capture](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mastodon-vs-opendatacapture