Martin Tile Servervssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 4 030 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +92 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 0 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 68/100 for Martin Tile Server, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+92 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with