Martin Tile ServervsRowfill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | Rowfill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #4 of 5 in Data Analysis |
| GitHub stars | 4 030 | 365 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +92 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 0 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Martin Tile Server scores 68/100 against 42/100 for Rowfill, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Rowfill.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; Rowfill needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+92 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →Rowfill details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep Rowfill, compare it with