# Martin Tile Server vs Redash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Martin Tile Server | Redash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 4 031 | 28 851 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Rust | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Redash scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Martin Tile Server, so it is the safer default.

Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.

Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+90 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Martin Tile Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/martin-tile-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/martin-tile-server.md)
- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/martin-tile-server-vs-redash