Martin Tile ServervsRedash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 4 030 | 28 850 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +89 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 2 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 68/100 for Martin Tile Server, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →Redash details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep Redash, compare it with