# Marmot vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Marmot | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 10 in Data Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 627 | 95 289 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 327 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.11.1 · 11 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 50/100 for Marmot, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Marmot.

If you want the quickest setup, Marmot is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Marmot](https://selfhost.directory/project/marmot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/marmot.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/marmot-vs-stirling-pdf