# Marmot vs open-wearables

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Marmot | open-wearables |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 10 in Data Management | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 627 | 2 728 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +173 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.11.1 · 11 Oct 2026 | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

open-wearables scores 63/100 against 50/100 for Marmot, so it is the safer default.

open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Marmot.

If you want the quickest setup, Marmot is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.

open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Marmot](https://selfhost.directory/project/marmot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/marmot.md)
- [open-wearables](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-wearables.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/marmot-vs-open-wearables