# marimo vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | marimo | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 23 364 ✓ | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +473 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 0.25.2 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

marimo scores 78/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

marimo ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; marimo needs more configuration.

marimo is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [marimo](https://selfhost.directory/project/marimo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/marimo.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/marimo-vs-workout-cool