Mailpitvstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailpit | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 784 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +358 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.32.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mailpit scores 77/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
Mailpit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, Mailpit is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Mailpit is growing faster right now (+358 stars in 30 days).
Mailpit details →tunesynctool details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailpit, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with