MailcowvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 13 713 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +215 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+215 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with