# Mailcow vs Urocissa

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mailcow | Urocissa |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 13 714 ✓ | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Mailcow scores 77/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.

Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Mailcow.

If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.

Mailcow is growing faster right now (+204 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mailcow](https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow.md)
- [Urocissa](https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urocissa.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mailcow-vs-urocissa