MailcowvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with