# Mailcow vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mailcow | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Mailcow scores 77/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

Mailcow is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mailcow](https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mailcow-vs-tunesynctool