MailcowvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with