Mailcowvstimesheet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | timesheet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 13 714 | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Vue |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timesheet.
If you want the quickest setup, timesheet is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+204 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →timesheet details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep timesheet, compare it with