# Mailcow vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mailcow | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Mailcow scores 77/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.

Mailcow is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mailcow](https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mailcow.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mailcow-vs-syncwatch