Mail-in-a-Boxvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 446 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 3 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | CC0-1.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Mail-in-a-Box ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with