Mail-in-a-BoxvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 15 446 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Mail-in-a-Box.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; Mail-in-a-Box needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with