Mail-in-a-Boxvsuncompressed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | uncompressed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 15 446 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 1 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.
Mail-in-a-Box ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →uncompressed details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep uncompressed, compare it with