Mail-in-a-BoxvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 15 446 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Mail-in-a-Box.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with