Mail-in-a-Boxvstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 15 445 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 1 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | CC0-1.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
Mail-in-a-Box ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+27 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →tunesynctool details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with