Mail-in-a-Boxvsnettu-scheduler
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mail-in-a-Box | nettu-scheduler | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 16 in Mail Server | #27 of 30 in Calendar & Contacts |
| GitHub stars | 15 447 | 562 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +29 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v77 · 26 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Mail-in-a-Box scores 72/100 against 42/100 for nettu-scheduler, so it is the safer default.
Mail-in-a-Box ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nettu-scheduler.
If you want the quickest setup, Mail-in-a-Box is easier to run; nettu-scheduler needs more configuration.
Mail-in-a-Box is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).
Mail-in-a-Box details →nettu-scheduler details →
Swap a project
Keep Mail-in-a-Box, compare it with
Keep nettu-scheduler, compare it with