magic-framevsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
magic-frame details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with