magic-framevsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
magic-frame details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with