# magic-frame vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | magic-frame | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.

## Details

- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/magic-frame-vs-upptime