magic-framevsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
magic-frame details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with