# magic-frame vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | magic-frame | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/magic-frame-vs-text-generation-webui