# magic-frame vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | magic-frame | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 45 680 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +841 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+841 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/magic-frame-vs-sentry