magic-framevssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 45 680 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +841 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 22 |
| Latest release | v1.5.11 · 29 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, magic-frame is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+841 stars in 30 days).
magic-frame details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with