magic-framevsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| magic-frame | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #58 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 511 | 393 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 876 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for magic-frame.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
magic-frame details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep magic-frame, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with