# MacOS vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MacOS | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 21 690 ✓ | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

MacOS scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.

MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.

MacOS is growing faster right now (+116 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/macos-vs-upptime