# MacOS vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MacOS | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 21 689 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.

MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/macos-vs-tradingagents