# MacOS vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MacOS | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 21 690 | 35 793 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 | +868 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MacOS.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/macos-vs-seaweedfs