MacOSvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 21 690 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 28 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MacOS.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
MacOS details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with