MacOSvsPortainer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 689 | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 21 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Zlib |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MacOS.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.
MacOS details →Portainer details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep Portainer, compare it with