# MacOS vs OmniRoute

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MacOS | OmniRoute |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 21 692 | 82 352 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +3 336 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.

MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)
- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/macos-vs-omniroute