MacOSvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 21 692 | 82 352 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +3 336 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.
MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 336 stars in 30 days).
MacOS details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with