# MacOS vs motionEye

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MacOS | motionEye |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 21 689 ✓ | 4 720 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 ✓ | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 ✓ | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MacOS scores 76/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.

MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.

If you want the quickest setup, motionEye is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.

MacOS is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MacOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/macos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/macos.md)
- [motionEye](https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/motioneye.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/macos-vs-motioneye