MacOSvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 21 690 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +116 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MacOS scores 76/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MacOS.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.
MacOS is growing faster right now (+116 stars in 30 days).
MacOS details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with