# MachinaOS vs nanoclaw

> Two self-hosted [OpenClaw alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/openclaw), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MachinaOS | nanoclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #74 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 1 045 | 31 043 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +203 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2026.10.0 · 9 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nanoclaw scores 78/100 against 54/100 for MachinaOS, so it is the safer default.

MachinaOS ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for nanoclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, nanoclaw is easier to run; MachinaOS needs more configuration.

nanoclaw is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MachinaOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/machinaos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/machinaos.md)
- [nanoclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/nanoclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nanoclaw.md)

## Related comparisons

- [AstrBot vs hermes-agent-with-webui](https://selfhost.directory/compare/astrbot-vs-hermes-agent-with-webui)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/machinaos-vs-nanoclaw