# LXD vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LXD | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 4 844 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | lxd-6.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

LXD scores 70/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

LXD ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, LXD is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.

## Details

- [LXD](https://selfhost.directory/project/lxd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lxd.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lxd-vs-uusec-waf