# LXC vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LXC | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Containers | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 288 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 70/100 for LXC, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for LXC.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LXC](https://selfhost.directory/project/lxc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lxc.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lxc-vs-tradingagents