LXCvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXC | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Containers | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 288 | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 28 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 70/100 for LXC, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for LXC.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
LXC details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep LXC, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with