# Lumabri vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Lumabri | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 202 | 61 545 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +483 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | C | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+483 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Lumabri](https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lumabri-vs-pi-hole