Luckyvsn8n
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lucky | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 20 in Network Utilities | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 8 269 | 208 889 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 080 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 205 |
| Latest release | v2.27.2 · 15 Feb 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
n8n scores 92/100 against 57/100 for Lucky, so it is the safer default.
n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Lucky.
If you want the quickest setup, Lucky is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.
n8n is growing faster right now (+3 080 stars in 30 days).