# LubeLogger vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | LubeLogger | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +2 430 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/lubelogger-vs-world-monitor